The VX Labs – Creating A Playscript in BSL part of our VX Labs programme, explored what it means to create a playscript conceived entirely in British Sign Language.

Delivered in partnership with and hosted at Sheffield Theatres.

Read more about the Lab.

At the end of the Lab, participating Deaf artist, Rinkoo Barbaga, shared this thoughts with us and his answer to the key question: is it possible to create a script in BSL?

Watch the video of the interview below (with subtitles). Scroll down for the BSL to English translation.

My name is Zoë McWhinney, and this is my sign name. I work as a director, theatre creator, writer, actor… I do a bit of everything!

1. What did you want to explore in this Lab?

I really wanted to be involved because I am a writer and I want to create more BSL-centred scripts which put BSL first within the creative process. BSL needs to be at the forefront. I wanted space and time to explore this further, to have the ability to experiment, taking in other people’s views, and look at different perspectives. and see which ones are successful or not. See what the benefits and negatives are. I also want to be able to close the gap between BSL and English, in terms of writing the stories, the dialogue and the scripts.
We want to devise a method that makes creating a BSL script as quick and easy as possible to give the writer freedom to be as creative as possible. This week has been devoted to seeing if BSL scripts can be created or not and looking at what a BSL script could potentially look like. This really intrigues me and motivates me. I want to look at how a BSL script can work. That was my aim this week.

2. Was there anything that surprised you?

I was surprised to learn that it took me half an hour to create two lines of BSL dialogue! This was useful for me to know. It means in the future, if I’m commissioned to write a BSL script, I will have some idea of how long I would need to create a BSL script in my way, in a visual way. And how long it will take. This will give me an idea of how much funding I would need to apply for to create a script for this length of time. The discussions with the other writers have been so rich. It’s been brilliant and interesting to see how the others have grappled with the question of whether a BSL script can be created coming up with their own answer. It’s been interesting working with a hearing illustrator as well. That’s it.

3. How has the Lab changed the way you think about creating a script in BSL?

My burning question is what is the fastest and most convenient way to write a BSL script that is also accessible to all people who know sign language so they can read it too. It would also be good to pilot it with varying levels of BSL fluency. Another pilot could be to try it with people from different backgrounds or who use different regional sign variations, actors from different ethnic and cultural backgrounds, to see what they get from using a BSL script. Another question would be, would video scripts work successfully or not? Comparing two scripts, a 2D script on a document and a video BSL script, would it be easier and more fluid to work from a video script? What resources would be needed to make a good video script?

4. What’s the one thing you would ask theatres to change to support Deaf playwrights?
I want theatres to be prepared to fund BSL scripts. To understand that we need to build an audience. Once you’ve built an audience, you need a writer and to create a space for deaf people to come together to share their work and continue collaborating. An idea of how funding can help is by paying for residencies for deaf writers to work together in a BSL friendly environment where they deaf people can be free to devise and be creative without having to think about how to translate their work into English. We need to create opportunities for this. This is something that deaf playwrights desperately need. There could also be seminars given led by professional writers such as by those who write in English, or with experience of writing in different languages. They could talk about their creative process.

Bring deaf writers to give talks. Charlie Swinbourne, for instance, who has written scripts for TV, or Ted Evans who has written film scripts. They could talk about their writing process and share their experiences and knowledge. It would be like a five-minute TED talk first thing in the morning. I’m just thinking of ideas out loud!

Just the opportunity to be able to meet and support each other. That’s what I’m asking theatres in the UK to do!

Video interview credits:

Storytelling visuals: Beka Haytch

Video editing and photgraphy: Charlie Swinbourne

 

VX Labs is a cutting-edge three-year research programme by Vital Xposure, supported through Arts Council England, the programme is delivered in partnership with the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama as well as regional theatres.

Read more about VX Labs

The VX Labs – Creating A Playscript in BSL part of our VX Labs programme, explored what it means to create a playscript conceived entirely in British Sign Language.

Delivered in partnership with and hosted at Sheffield Theatres.

Read more about the Lab.

At the end of the Lab, participating Deaf artist, Rinkoo Barbaga, shared this thoughts with us and his answer to the key question: is it possible to write a script in BSL?

Watch the video of the interview below (with subtitles). Scroll down for the BSL to English translation.

 

My name is Rinkoo Barpaga and this is my sign name. I’m a performer. Plus I do a variety of other artistic work.

1. What did you want to explore in this Lab?  

The original plan was to work out how we can record our original sign language, BSL, on documents. Trying to avoid any reliance on English. We wanted to focus on sign language only. This is something that was new to us, creating ways to translate from the original sign language version to perform it in BSL. This was an interesting project.

2. What is your big take away from the week? 

My key takeaway this week has been learning about subtext on a deeper level. It’s interesting. An example of this is when I say something, it can have a double or underlying meaning, which can be tricky. A lot of our discussions have been about this. This is something that’s been on my mind. Really, it’s up to the audience when they watch the performance, to identify whether there’s a double meaning or inference. This has been a new way of working for me this week.

3. Was there anything that surprised you? 

One thing that has surprised me this week is that I’ve learned that hundreds and hundreds of years ago, when there were no cameras or videos. Back in the day some people drew pictures. But in the drawings of sign language, they only drew the hands. Back then a lot of people only drew the box around the hands.  And mostly the alphabet, basic – like A, B and C, fingerspelling. But I was interested to know about the emotional expressions, not only fingerspelling, but the story. If you focus only on the hands, you’re not looking at the body language or the facial expressions. It’s really important for the deaf community to use body language with signing and facial expressions. It’s really important that we tie them together. Back in the day, a lot of the drawings were drawn by hearing people who were naive about deaf people and I was interested in that.

4. How has the Lab changed the way you think about creating a script in BSL? 

What’s important is that first, we see our sign language on the document and as the basis for our story. The most important thing is to be able to create in BSL on the document which we can then further develop. I’m not sure about how we would work with emotions and different regional signs. This is something that we need to delve into further to understand how it can work.

5. What’s the one thing you would ask theatres to change to support Deaf playwrights? 

We need theatre directors to accept that we want BSL in our scripts. Maybe they prefer having English scripts, but why isn’t it possible or acceptable to have BSL scripts too? You can have both. I need the hearing directors to be more aware, more open-minded. They need to be open minded and think about how they choose a writer based on their signing. With all the differences and regional variations, gender differences, so much variation. This is something that directors need to investigate and understand closely. So they can understand the rich textures and qualities of BSL that is needed when choosing scripts. This is why it’s important to have BSL scripts as well as English working from both.

Video interview credits:

Storytelling visuals: Beka Haytch

Video editing and photgraphy: Charlie Swinbourne

 

VX Labs is a cutting-edge three-year research programme by Vital Xposure, supported through Arts Council England, the programme is delivered in partnership with the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama as well as regional theatres.

Read more about VX Labs

Children and Young People was a four-day long Lab, part of our VX Labs programme, that examined methods for making disabled-led work for children. The Lab was delivered in partnership with and hosted by Z-Arts.

Read more about the Lab

After a workshare at the end of the Lab, Ciaran Stewart, Monique Jarrett and Ada Evarama, three of the artists involved in the process, sat down with us to discuss the process.

1. When you were invited to join this laboratory, what was the first question that you wanted to explore?

Ciaran: When I was approached for this project, one of my biggest questions was: What do the young people want from the process? What do they want from the show that we’re all creating together?

This week, we’ve been calling the young people we’re working with the ‘creative consultants’, which is a quite interesting thing that I’ve never experienced before. I grew up going to theatre and I know how special theatre can be. It’s so exciting to see the young people come up with ideas and then us, as professionals, create something out of scratch to show to them, and hopefully it worked well for them.

Monique: My first question was: how is this going to happen in such a short space of time? Also, I knew names of some people in the Lab, and  I wanted to know how we’d work together, and hoped I’d do a good enough job!

Ada: As Monique says, I knew it was a brilliant team. So I asked, how do we combine everyone’s brilliance in the space? And when I first saw the comic strips, the resource and actually knew what we were working with, I was even more thinking: how are we going to make this funny and accessible?

2. What is your big take away from the week?

Ciaran: The importance of theatre and why we create theatre and why we do the show. It’s easy as actors to imagine we just want to be on stage all the time, but what I love is the process of getting to the stage. Today has reminded me to just have fun with rehearsals, have fun with creativity: especially the process hearing from the young people, the creative consultants, what they want. It’s really inspiring to play with their ideas and figure out how we’re going to make it happen.

Monique: In one word: Integrated. Integrated, with the creativity of access within it from day one. I don’t know if the kids even know, notice or realise that there is also creative access within the show. I think it was just like a great show, which is what I would want theatre to be anyway.

Ada: We all came in as individuals with different areas that we have a lot of experience in, brought together in this soup of this week, creating something. The process let hone their profession and do their job. We fed into it and listened to it and invited every voice to collaborate. We took and we added, added to the soup.

3. What would be the one thing you would like to change about how children’s theatre is being made or presented?

Ciaran: Just seeing more deaf and disabled talent on stage for children and young people to see and normalise. It’s so important to normalise seeing someone with a wheelchair or seeing someone who’s deaf have an interpreter in the space. For example, today, a young person was sitting next to Jude [a participant that uses BSL] and gesturing to demonstrate using binoculars, and this was a natural, instinctive acknowledgement that there’s sign in the space – and that is really important, because at the end of the day, they are just young people who want to learn and who just enjoy seeing the talent on the stage. Ultimately, that is what I would love to see in the future of children, because the more we do of this, the more that we are raising young, empathetic people who can be the leaders of this country.

Monique: A company doesn’t usually go in and ask kids ‘how would you like the show to be and then create it?’ The kids are why it was so successful. You can’t have a bunch of adults prescribing this is what kids want – you need to ask the audience you’re catering to. They have ownership and they know what they want.

Ada: If you’re making children’s theatre, especially for children with disabilities or with access needs, it also needs to be made with artists and collaborators with disabilities and with access needs to build into that. It was only able to be as accessible as it was because all these brilliant people were brought in.

4. What would be your top tip to anyone who is interested in creating an accessible children’s theatre show?

Ciaran: Well, number one: hire deaf and disabled talent, and with the right pay. And not just on stage, but also behind the scenes as well. They’re the experts, they’re the ones with lived experiences and therefore they’re the ones who can educate. Secondly: Just go for it, just do it.

Thirdly, go and see lots of accessible theatre. Access doesn’t have to be just about ‘how do we create that’s something that’s accessible for d/Deaf people?’ or ‘how do we make it accessible for visually impaired people?’ Yes, those are important questions and yes, we need to do that, but at the same time, access is for all. I think we need to change the language of access being for everyone. For example – today [at the workshare]- if the young person is looking at the captions, they’re actually learning from the captions, they’re making links between the written language, the spoken and the BSL. It’s as simple as that.

Monique: Very first and foremost – never assume what your audience wants. Always involve the audience and obviously make it inclusive, so involve disabled artists as well.

There wasn’t a situation of kids labelling the show ‘disabled’. It wasn’t mentioned that in the original the lead character in the story we worked on wasn’t a wheelchair user, but in the extract we developed and presented today [at the workshare] he was. They just took in the show.

 

A white man with a short beard and glasses, smiling. He is wearing a black T-shirt. On the wall behind him, a drawing of cherry tree with white birds on its branches.

Ciaran Stewart is an actor, BSL consultant and captioning consultant.

Two women next to each other, smiling at the camera. A Black British Caribbean female with burgundy dyed hair pulled back, and a Black woman of West African descent with long braided hair.

Monique Jarrett (left) is a performer.  Ada Eravama (right) is an audio description and access consultant.

 

VX Labs is a cutting-edge three-year research programme by Vital Xposure, supported through Arts Council England, the programme is delivered in partnership with the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama as well as regional theatres.

Read more about VX Labs

Decolonising Disability was a four-day long Lab, part of our VX Labs programme, that provided a safe space for six disabled artists from the Global Majority to navigate their next steps in the industry.

The Lab was delivered in partnership with and hosted at Bristol Old Vic. Across a week in early March, participating artists worked together to unpack their process of making work through a series of workshops delivered by Zuleika Lebow and Annabel Crowley, Independent Facilitators and Harris Albar from Tamasha Theatre.

Read more about the Lab

A few days after the Lab, participating artists shared with Vital Xposure what it was like being part of the Lab at Bristol Old Vic:

1. What was the key question you wanted to explore or find answers to before coming to the Lab?

Rene: It was interesting, because I didn’t know what to expect. I think it was for me to examine: Can my disability stop me from developing my creative practice, or is it something that I can use to develop my artistry? That was a burning question.

I was interested in meeting other creatives with disabilities who were part of the Global Majority. It was such an exciting space to work with very likeminded people.

Eli: One of the big questions I had was; how do you make that transition from pursuing something as a passion project or a hobby and making that transition into: ‘no, this is my career’. I also wanted to learn practical steps. Also I had some existential questions:  Am I doing the right thing? Is this the right place? I think I felt coming out of the workshop with just a lot of reassurance from my peers and the facilitators.

 

2. What is your big takeaway from the process?  

Rene: At the end of every day, I walked away so happy. I walked away encouraged and walked away thinking God, you’re not alone. Over the last 20 years I’ve been in many, many meetings and workshops. I’ve never walked away feeling like that. The biggest takeaway of the experience was the lasting feeling that I can do it.

I feel like every creative, with or without a disability should have to do this workshop. It gave me a grounding and a starting point for what I want to do.

Most of all, it reminded me: Your disability isn’t limiting. It shouldn’t limit you to not achieve what you want to do. As a creative with a disability, you have the right to ask for support that you need in order for you to be great at your practice.

We’ve started talking about working together, collaborating. The six of us want to create a collective: ‘Aggressively Civil: We’re Not A Gang’!

Eli: Reassurance was a word that we were saying constantly throughout the week. Connection was also such a massive one, because it is just so rare to be in a room full of other artists, and then you add the artists that are all disabled, and then you add the fact that it was all artists from the Global Majority: All those different layers of community. I’ve never been in a room like that before. I think we all, or I at least, really cherished that and how important intersectionality is. It was so refreshing to be in that space where there was so much shared experiences, shared emotions and shared joy.

The workshop was definitely what I needed to remind me that I do deserve to be here. I’m in the right place. It was just so refreshing and not like anything I’ve experienced before.

 

3. What would be your top tip for disabled artists from the Global Majority?

Rene: You’re incredible, and you’re amazing, and you can do it. Find us. Find your tribe, find us. We’re here, and we’ll make sure that you don’t feel alone and that you’re part of something even greater as well.

Eli: I think the biggest thing that I’ve learned is asking for help and asking for those connections. It is really scary to reach out and message someone, or to reply to an invitation or an opportunity, and be candid in that way of ‘Look, I’d really love to do this, but your venue is not accessible. How can we work around that?’ Or ‘I’d love to do it, I can’t afford it. Can you offer a fee or reaching out to other disabled Global Majority artists?’

One brilliant thing about social media is that it just gives you access to so many people that you wouldn’t otherwise interact with. I think getting over the awkward human fear of that kind of daunting social interaction, and just being able to reach out and say ‘Hey, I’ve seen your work. I really liked what you do. I’d love to connect. I’d love to maybe work on something. I’d love to seek advice.’

 

4. What is the one thing you would change to improve sector support for disabled artists from the global majority?

Rene: It’s taken us such a long time to get this far, and we still have got a long way to go as well. But one thing? Firstly, acknowledging that artists from the Global Majority with disabilities do exist and are actually calling out, wanting programmes like this.

Create spaces for artists from the with Global Majority with disabilities, in order to learn together. One thing that we all said at the end of this workshop was that we just don’t feel alone anymore.

Eli: Moving diversity past just as inclusion, past just a bare minimum. We need to be not just invited to have a seat at the table every so often, when we’re desired, but to be able to be in the room all the time. One of the facilitators used the metaphor of a tent: it was the idea that we are all sat in this tent, and you don’t refuse to let people in. You make the tent bigger.

 

5. How did the Lab help you develop your artistic practice?

Rene: I wrote a monologue for the last day. Then I wanted lighting and someone to do sound, everyone was going to have a programme. In that moment I just felt so happy that I thought ‘Dream big and don’t limit yourself.’ I think the bigger, the better, the bolder. The discoveries of this laboratory have become the foundation of how I want to work and is something that I will keep returning to on a regular basis.

Eli: As part of the workshop, we performed a small piece of work. Mine was about trying to bring a kind of joy and whimsy and imagination back into what we do. So I ran a ‘silliness workshop’ as I called it. I just brought in pieces of my drag, and we did a little runway, and everyone was able to dress up and have a moment of having people cheer and clap for them. I think having that a moment in the spotlight is something that’s really special, and something that drag has enabled me to do and to have, and something that I wanted to pass on to other people.

A selfie of a Black woman with long, straight dark hair, that falls across her face. She has winged eyeliner and is wearing a yellow ribbed jumper, with a neutral expression on her face.

Rene Katiisa (she / her) is a multidisciplinary artist, creating theatre through performance, writing and directing lenses. Her work draws heavily from live music, classical instruments and film. 

 

A selfie of a Black woman with long, straight dark hair, that falls across her face. She has winged eyeliner and is wearing a yellow ribbed jumper, with a neutral expression on her face.

Eli Reina-Morris (they / he) is a drag king, performing as Diomede. Member of House of Mannington and regular performer in Black Excellence Cabaret, camp and cringe Diomede specialises in lip-sync and comedy.

VX Labs is a cutting-edge three-year research programme by Vital Xposure, supported through Arts Council England, the programme is delivered in partnership with the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama as well as regional theatres.

Read more about VX Labs

Beacon is a series of short films shining a light on disabled, d/Deaf and Neurodivergent Writers who share their experiences of the sector, talk about the importance of writing for theatre and what it means to them, and what they wish our theatres could do to truly change the under-representation of disabled playwrights in the industry.

A provocation to think differently and to continue the dialogue with new and existing voices in writing. How can we sustain theatre if we don’t actively nurture artists that make it happen? When we do not have all the answers, let’s not be afraid to ask.

In early 2023 we invited disabled Writers from our Wellspring 2021-2022 cohort to tackle these questions together and gauge what solutions could look like.

We share their ideas and provocations, through the Beacon films: four films profiling each Writer and a curated group discussion with Robbie Curran, Fatima Serghini, Gabriella MacPherson and Victoria Taylor Roberts, a total of five short films.

The Beacon films are produced by Vital Xposure Ltd and funded by The Harold Hyam Wingate Foundation and Didymus CIO.

Find out more about Beacon and watch the short films.

We are proud that Vital Xposure’s Artistic Director, Julie McNamara has been awarded a Miegunyah Distinguished Visiting Fellowship at the University of Melbourne for 2019. Julie Mc has continued her research into disability-led theatre-making and how this shifts the discourse on inclusive art where disability narratives are – and should be – truly embedded from the start.

On 3rd April she delivered a public lecture on ‘Cripping it Up: When Disability-led Theatre Awakens our Critical Consciousness to the Non-normative Body and Unruly Mind Unleashed in Public Spaces​‘, hosted by the Faculty Of Fine Arts and Music, University of Melbourne. It was received with great enthusiasm by audiences, we are sharing below just a few of the most heart-warming comments that went viral on social media:

“I have never felt as welcome, included, or valued and respected as I did on Wednesday evening when we journeyed to the VCA (Victorian College of the Arts) to hear the exceptionally insightful and sincere, yet still supremely well crafted and soul bearing words of the charismatic and dynamic Julie McNamara”

“Standing in front of projections providing visual images from disabled artist Alison Lapper – The Alternative Venus, Julie said a hard home truth – that we are all prejudiced”.

The lecture was filmed and you can now view it online via the link below. Please note that Captions can be activated by clicking on the ‘CC’ button at the bottom right of the video. Enjoy!

You can read more in Julie McNamara’s interview on ‘Precinct’, published by the University of Melbourne.

Congratulations Julie Mc!

Article by Russel Parton

First published on East End Review and Hackney Citizens, 24 August 2016

Inspired by the tragic story of war reporter Dorothy Lawrence, Blue Pen looks at the lives of women journalists whose voices have been silenced

A female journalist who disguised herself as a soldier and travelled to the front on a bicycle during the First World War is the inspiration for a film premiering next month at Hackney Picturehouse.

Blue Pen focuses on ten women journalists whose voices have been silenced through censorship, confinement in institutions and abuse.

Although largely set in the present day, the film’s title refers to the wartime government’s practice of censoring letters and reports from the front.

“I was considering the number of women journalists who are disappeared and executed to this day,” says Julie McNamara, the artistic director of Hackney-based theatre company Vital Xposure.

“So we began to make an experimental short film looking at censorship and blue pen, and Dorothy Lawrence’s story was the springboard.”

When the war broke out, Dorothy Lawrence was 19-year-old aspiring journalist brought up in the care of the church by a guardian whom she later claimed had raped her.

Although very few journalists were allowed to the front Lawrence felt she had every right to report on the war, and – in the era of the suffragettes – believed there was nothing a woman couldn’t do.

“She got the boat to Calais, bought a bicycle and then cycled to the front line,” says McNamara.

“Everyone she met along the way thought it was a jolly jape and that she’d never make it.”

Arrested by French police two miles short of the front line, she was ordered to turn back. Then in Paris she befriended a group of soldiers in a café. She persuaded them to smuggle her a uniform piece by piece and teach her how to march.

Lawrence arrived at the front in perfect disguise and enlisted under the name Sapper (Private) Dennis Smith. But two weeks later a young soldier wanting to earn his stripes “dobbed her in it”.

“All hell was let loose. She was investigated and of course they suspected she was a spy. Then they thought she was a ‘camp follower’, the term they used for legalised prostitutes working on the front line.”

The silencing of Dorothy Lawrence took various forms. Her writings were heavily censored, to the extent that she was never taken seriously. She was also threatened with court martial (even though women couldn’t serve in the armed forces) and placed in a nunnery in France, before being escorted back to Britain.

By 1925, Lawrence’s dreams of Fleet Street looked increasingly remote. Her heavily censored book Sapper Dorothy Lawrence: The Only English Woman Soldierflopped commercially, and after confiding to a doctor that her church guardian has raped her she was taken into care and later deemed insane.

She was committed first to the London County Mental Hospital and then institutionalised at the Colney Hatch Lunatic Asylum in Friern Barnet. She died at Friern Hospital in 1964 and was buried in a pauper’s grave in New Southgate Cemetery.

Blue Pen is more an art film than anything else and is not a dramatic film,” says McNamara.

“It begins with truth of Dorothy Lawrence’s story and creates in the audience’s mind an atmosphere of Dorothy Lawrence’s interrogation and what became of her.

“It then moves on to give ten names from the last decade who have each been disappeared, the majority executed, and so the final question you’re left with is: what is it with the dangerousness of women telling the truth?”

Alongside the premiere of Blue Pen, the launch will also include a screening ofEmma Humphreys the Legacy, a documentary short about a teenage sex worker who spent ten years behind bars for killing her boyfriend and pimp, whose case eventually changed the law for those in abusive relationships who kill.

There will also be a panel discussion and live music from Lorraine Jordan, a singer-songwriter who wrote Anna’s Song, a tribute to assassinated Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya.

 

Blue Pen launch event
6 September
The Attic, Hackney Picturehouse
270 Mare Street
E8 1HE
More information and tickets

 

Why Blue Pen?

Julie McNamara talks about censorship of women’s voices in this experimental short film co-directed with Caglar Kimyoncu.

Interview by Emilia Teglia

In Autumn 2015 we toured a theatre production: The Disappearance of Dorothy Lawrence. At the close of the tour I felt that we had thoroughly disappeared her voice. I hadn’t achieved what I’d set out to do. I kept asking myself: where is the strength of her voice this extraordinary young journalist called Dorothy Lawrence? Why was her diary so heavily censored by the war office? Why is it not accessible? What is it they don’t want us to know all these years later?

In spite of the presence of her journal – Sapper Dorothy, published by Leonaur in 2010, we are still missing some of the facts. As you read through it you’re left with more questions than answers: “What did that mean?” or “how did she get away with that…?” and “she would have said more about that, of course she would! Why isn’t it here?” and then you realise that her writing, her original papers have been lost in the annals of a history re-told by men.

Dorothy was escorted home from France in the summer of 1915, she had been on the Frontline for just over two weeks. Initially confined to a nunnery before being taken through rigorous investigation, she was interrogated by over 20 officers, all confounded by her presence on the lines, not knowing what to make of her. You are not a spy, but who are you? What kind of a woman are you dressed as a man? And what on earth do we do with you now you’ve been discovered?  They couldn’t court martial her as women were not allowed to enlist. Her alter ego Denis Smith couldn’t be court martialled as he didn’t effectively exist.

Much emboldened by her experiences and by the growing strength of the suffragette movement at that time, Dorothy refused to be returned to the church Guardian where she had been taken for moral guidance in her teens. She reported that same Guardian for rape and was effectively silenced; diagnosed with Hysteria and removed to a lunatic asylum where she was confined for the rest of her life.

I began to look at what our successive governments have done with bright young women who disrupt the status quo.
Asylums were set up to provide sanctuary were they not? A creative and compassionate idea from the Quaker movement to begin with.
Those asylums became institutions for containment and control – a solution to so many social outcasts in an era of moral panics.

To begin with, the impetus for creating the film Blue Pen came from feeling that we had colluded with the deletion of Dorothy’s voice. That was the starting point. I sat and talked ideas through with Caglar Kimyoncu, who I have worked alongside for over 15 years. We wanted to look over the past hundred years, and ask ourselves: What do we do with dissenting voices? What do we do with the voices of women journalists today, particularly in times of conflict? And I discovered that too many of them had been executed or disappeared.

I am connected through a passion for celtic music to renowned singer and songwriter Lorraine Jordan, who wrote the song for Anna Politkovskaya, the journalist executed in 2006. Through Lorraine I met Mariana Katzarova, who created RAW – Reaching All Women in War. I started looking at their work on defenders of the truth who place themselves in grave danger or through no choice of their own are living in grave danger. All these journalists who face extreme circumstances in order to speak the truth, in the hope of saving lives. Of course this has gone on for centuries. Human beings are the most destructive species on earth. Women have been tortured and disappeared in every war ever fought. Sadly there are now more wars across the planet than ever. It has become too commonplace whilst we are all so driven by Capitalism. War is just another industry.
War makes money.

Silhouette next to door. Image by Caglar Kimyoncu

 

I was talking to Mariana Katsarova to ask her about Anna Politkovskaya who was executed ten years ago in Russia on the 6th of October. I wanted to use Anna’s image as part of the film. I wanted to select ten women journalists who have all been disappeared, one from each decade over the past 100 years whilst we are all commemorating the centenary of the first world war. I had a meeting with Mariana on Saturday and she said: “You want to pick my brain? You know how many people are out there? Women journalists who have been executed?” She has been monitoring it for some time.

I was watching a film from WOW – Women of the World festival, South bank, where they’re talking about how women’s voices are silenced. Speaking on behalf of the women of Syria, and the people of Syria, Kholoud Waleed was talking about the importance of understanding that actually the majority of people left in Syria are women. “The breadwinners are women,” she said, “What you see on your screens are the men out there in the streets, still in battle. Your perception out here is that we’re all terrorists”, she said. “That’s not the truth. 70% of Syrians left in the country are women – the carers, looking after those who could not leave.” And she said “I speak for them. And in the headquarters, believe it or not, in ISIS headquarters, one of our main reporters is a woman. Who of course is in full veil, so she can come and go freely with the women. People will talk to her. And she gets the most reports out.”

The thing to remember is that Blue Pen is not a documentary, it’s an experimental art film. We used actors, although we used them as authentically as we could; we used the real facts and some of the script is verbatim from women journalists returning from conflict zones; the shoot location is interesting because although the house used is in the South of France it is a house where they discovered a war diary. It’s haunted with the same old mess. And the location is very close to where France had one of its most shameful days in its’ history over the past 200 years.

I think our film will leave people with questions but I want them to feel stirred, I want them to feel moved, I want them to start asking questions themselves about the disappearance of women journalists and dissenting voices.

Blue Pen Information, Dates and Tickets.

Let Me Stay – Interview with Creatives by Naomi Cortes

Julie McNamara (writer and performer) and Paulette Randall (director) were interviewed by Naomi Cortes to share their inspiration and ideas for the production of Let Me Stay.

Share with us how you began to collaborate together?

Julie: I had read about Paulette’s work, when I was on placement with Talawa Theatre and I was looking for a new Director for a play I was working on. Other artists had suggested I contact her. So in 2009, whilst working on the production of Crossings we had an initial chat on the telephone and she suggested we meet for lunch.

Paulette: Yeah, from the phone call I followed my instinct and knew it was going to work. When we met for lunch we really connected about storytelling and music and I knew that her work was something I really wanted to explore.

Julie: I had no expectations and went to meet her with an open mind and an open heart and thought great she’s going to do the job.

Why did you decide to place your mother Shirley at the centre of Let Me Stay?

Julie: I’ve always listened to my mother’s stories and her mother before her, my grandmother.  My mother still remains one of the funniest women I have ever met, she’s extraordinary. She’s full of life and has a strong rebellious spirit and I just thought other people should meet her.

One day I was playing truant from school and was smoking a fag at home and mum came home unexpectedly. I was trying to hide it behind my back and she told me she’d seen it. I thought she was going to tell me off, but actually she was playing hooky from work and had walked out during an appraisal. I never forgot that day because we both had an afternoon together playing hooky and she told me why she had walked out. She didn’t know words like feminism, but she was the first real feminist I ever knew.

Writing Let Me Stay has become part of my own grief in letting go. My mother’s been living with Alzheimer’s for ten years. She has been many people to me and I have always been on shifting sands with her, it made me think about who we are to each other in each space we travel, in each world we inhabit.

It’s also about challenging all those ubiquitous images around what a terrible, dark tragedy it is to end your life with Alzheimer’s. I have to be honest. I’m witnessing somebody who is quite enjoying herself. She’s having the time of her life.

What made you think that now was the right time to explore Alzheimer’s in your work?

Julie: It was just before my mum’s physical tipping point. We had been working together on this for a while with songs and stories. I would share back what she had said, she would deny having said it, I would remind her she had and we would laugh.

Or I would show her pictures of things she had done. One of the funniest was when she had decorated a mug tree with chocolate bars and I showed her the photo of it. She asked who had done it, I explained she had and she said ‘well, that’s very clever!’. I thought it would be really sad if all of that was lost inside some dark story about how at the end of her life she withdrew away from it all. Shirley is dancing and grooving up and down the wards, very much the life and soul of the party.

Paulette, what attracted you to the story of Let Me Stay and working with Julie again?

Paulette: After our first time of working together, I said to Julie, I wanted to keep working with her. And when she came back from working in New Zealand and Australia, she confided in me that she was better known over there than in U.K. I thought this was a disgrace and I wanted people to know Julie McNamara here, because I think she has a really important voice and a beautiful, funny way of telling stories. Her work touches and moves people and with all the voices out there in theatre at the moment, there is nothing quite like hers.

Whilst training, I chose a course which was about working with specific communities. So, creating work with Julie was the first time in my career I worked with a mixed ability group. And that was terrifying and exhilarating because I didn’t know what to expect, it was going in at the deep end for me, but it was a brilliant opportunity.

And we both knew from the beginning of Let Me Stay that this was just the starting point, that the show had a life and that’s quite exciting.

Tell us about a magical moment which happens onstage?

Paulette: We were looking for things which could be found during the play amongst the many boxes on the set. And Julie found an old record box of singles and in it was a copy of Queen Bitch by David Bowie. And written on the label was ‘this is no reference to you!’

Julie: And it was in my dad’s handwriting. I had never seen this before.

Paulette: It’s brilliant, funny and beautiful. It’s a great track.

Julie: So, every time I take that out on stage, it’s like a message from my dad.

The journey within the production is incredibly personal and intimate, how do you manage to maintain this onstage whilst working within the conventions of theatre?

Paulette: I have to remember that Julie is the writer and the performer. I have to honour both those roles. Sometimes when I’m directing Julie we will talk about what the writer would say if they were in the room. And I remind her in rehearsals that the script is more eloquent and tells the story in a more successful way than if you were just saying it.

Julie: Once I have made the decision to commit it to the page, my role as the writer is very different to Julie who is remembering. I think I’m a savage editor of my own work and I’m quite happy for it to be a live process. The first script you take into rehearsal is like a road map but it’s not necessarily where we’ll end up. What I love is being able to surrender that to Paulette and saying ‘there you go’.

And being in the show, I then surrender the connection to Julie McNamara the person who has lived that moment. The director is the boss. I trust Paulette with my life, she’s a great director.

We know that music can make people living with Alzheimer’s experience great joy. How important is music to the production?

Julie: It all started with Shirley. I began recording her singing, when she started losing her language. I know that music is in a different part of the brain to language and her singing voice is sweet. I recorded quite a few tracks of her singing.

Paulette: To add to what Julie has said, one of the things I love about her work is the music. I discovered that there had been music and song in everything she’s done, it’s an integral part of her life. So it wasn’t surprising to me that music was being included in Let Me Stay. And it’s also a cultural thing, there are certain communities where singing is important. It’s important to storytelling.

Finally, what gift would you like your audiences to leave with?

Julie: A sense of hope. Alzheimer’s is not an apologetic withdrawal from life.

Paulette: Being able to not fear something you don’t understand…embrace it.

 

Libby Watson on the design process for the show

I chose to make a setting of different shaped boxes to reflect the idea of Shirley’s world in a state of compartments and change. Some of the boxes are closed and are never looked into and some of them get reopened and the contents remembered. The wall of boxes also gives us a fragmented view of the photographs that we project onto it, a comment on the loss of lucidity in memory. The white of the boxes was chosen as a positive statement and to give us a feeling of some kind of interior space. It can represent wallpaper and windows or just be an abstract wall with lit up boxes at the end showing glimmers of clarity

The chair was chosen to reflect Shirley’s vivacious and glamorous nature. It meant that we could look at her past in a way that celebrated her personality. It is also a style form the 60’s and one that I can imagine Gina Lollobrigida having in her italian sitting room. I wanted it to be a chair that Shirley would love and one that she would enjoy sitting in.

The second circular carpet for the BSL interpreter makes their space connected to the set and therefore to the show. It is a mini version of the playing space and the white circular carpet acts as it’s own individual spotlight.

 

Caglar Kimyoncu, who created the visuals for Let Me Stay shares some of his thoughts…

I’ve filmed and photographed Julie and her environment for over 15 years and her work often contains autobiographical elements. I then met Shirley and she was very welcoming. Every time I saw her in Liverpool or London, she shared her past ‘lives’ through stories and songs. Shirley loved the camera and the camera loved her.

Shirley is a natural star with a unique way of telling stories, singing and linking things together and Julie is a very good story teller. The images and sounds of Shirley on screen and stage create dialogue and a conflict between Julie’s interpretation of Shirley and Shirley as herself. This is true to their relationship in life.

 

Let Me Stay toured UK and internationally between 2013 and 2015. Shirley McNamara saw one of the latest shows at a care home in Liverpool. She sung along with her own recorded voice and at the end of the show, she stood up and warmly thanked her audience.